poly-substance use

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

More depression symptoms were associated with greater frequency of poly-substance use over time, with effects moderated by gender (significant for males but not females for poly-substance and marijuan

Effect: decline; beta = .05, t(7726) = 4.24

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11