ExploreInterventionLower grade point average
Intervention

Lower grade point average

Also known as: Lower grade point average (GPA) as baseline risk factor for substance use GPA
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (27)

None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11
None
decline

Lower baseline GPA was associated with more poly-substance use over time and with increased use of each substance individually, with a gender interaction showing the effect was stronger for males than

Effect: decline; beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Size: beta = -.09, t(7588) = -7.11

Papers (1)