PMC2927984

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2

Adolescents at risk of severe affective disorders were nearly three times as likely to report ever having sex as those not at risk, with a strong linear dose-response between severity of affective dis

Effect: decline; AOR 2.8; CI: 95%CI:1.9-4.2