Perceived stigma
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7