ExploreConditionAffective Disorders
Condition

Affective Disorders

Also known as: AFFECTIVE DIS Affective Disorder Affective Disorders Affective disorder Disorder of affect Disorder of affect, NOS Disorder, Affective Disorder, Mood Disorders, Affective Disorders, Mood MOOD DIS Mood Disorder +12 more
12 findings 1 paper 8 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Feeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.

Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7

Size: AOR 3.7 CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
decline

Household poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta

Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Size: AOR 1.9 CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7

Papers (1)