Affective Disorders
Related entities
Findings (50)
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineFeeling shunned by others was the strongest independent predictor of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, with nearly four-fold increased odds after adjustment.
Effect: decline; AOR 3.7; CI: 95%CI:2.5-5.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7
None
declineHousehold poverty was independently associated with nearly double the odds of being at risk of affective disorders among rural Zimbabwean youth, after adjusting for age, gender, education, marital sta
Effect: decline; AOR 1.9; CI: 95%CI:1.4-2.7