PMC10120568

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners who attended an interdisciplinary DSMES program with persons with diabetes reported high levels of tangible support (3.8/5), collaboration (3.8/5), and emotional support (3.8/5), with mo

Effect: improvement; Tangible support 3.8 (SD 1.1), Collaboration 3.8 (SD 1.0), Emotional support 3.8 (SD 1.0), FIAD helpful items 3.0 (SD 1.3), all on 5-poin

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale

Care partners reported that D1D increased their diabetes knowledge (mean 3.5/5), with 62.5% having no prior formal diabetes education. CPs retained information about dietary recommendations, meal plan

Effect: improvement; Knowledge increase mean 3.5 (SD 1.1); Program impact on own health mean 2.9 (SD 1.3); both on 5-point Likert scale