Care partner harmful involvement behaviors

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale

Care partners who attended D1D reported low levels of harmful involvement in diabetes care (mean 1.8/5 on FIAD harmful subscale), with some acknowledging challenges in providing support without being

Effect: improvement; FIAD harmful items mean 1.8 (SD 0.7) on 5-point scale