Screening for dysphagia

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Children classified into a high fatigue and sleep disturbance profile during the first year of ALL therapy demonstrated significantly poorer post-treatment attention outcomes, including auditory susta

Effect: decline; mean difference = 11.33 (distractibility)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)

Absence of comorbid panic disorder, skin picking disorder, and tic disorder were each independently and significantly associated with natural recovery from trichotillomania after controlling for age:

Effect: improvement; Panic: 22.22% vs 40.57% (p = 0.0268); Skin picking: 17.46% vs 34.29% (p = 0.0315); Tic: 3.17% vs 16% (p = 0.0362)