Coronary artery calcium score

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women

A coronary artery calcium score of zero was the strongest negative risk marker for ruling out future cardiovascular disease events over 10 years, resulting in a mean 46% relative reduction in pre-test

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.54 (SD 0.12) for CVD; DLR 0.49 (0.10) in men, 0.59 (0.12) in women