ExploreOutcomedownward risk reclassification of 10-year CVD risk
Outcome

downward risk reclassification of 10-year CVD risk

Also known as: Accuracy of downward risk reclassification from above 7.5% to below 7.5% 10-year CVD risk, measured by Net Reclassification Improvement CVD
3 findings 1 paper 3 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
studys

Findings (27)

None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among
None
improvement

CAC=0 resulted in the largest and most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 negative risk markers, consistently regardless of the risk threshold definition used.

Effect: improvement; largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among all 13 markers

Size: largest, most accurate downward risk reclassification among

Papers (1)