Papersprediabetes7854496

Factors affecting achievement of glycemic targets among type 2 diabetes patients in South Asia: analysis of the CARRS Trial

Diabetes research and clinical practice · 01-1-2021 · 7854496 on PMC →
Entities in this paper
Adherence to prescribed diet Presence of persistent poor glycemic control Multicomponent quality improvement intervention Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus Inadequate achievement of developmental tasks Poor glycemic control

Extracted findings (8)

Adherence to prescribed medications was associated with a 46% higher probability of achieving guideline-recommended glycemic control (HbA1c <7%) in the final multivariate model (RR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.09

Effect: improvement; RR: 1.46; CI: 95% CI: 1.09, 1.95

Size: RR: 1.46 CI: 95% CI: 1.09, 1.95

Adherence to diet plans was associated with a 79% higher probability of achieving guideline-recommended glycemic control (HbA1c <7%) in the final multivariate model (RR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.43-2.23), the

Effect: improvement; RR: 1.79; CI: 95% CI: 1.43, 2.23

Size: RR: 1.79 CI: 95% CI: 1.43, 2.23

Adherence to exercise plans was significantly associated with achieving HbA1c <7% in bivariate analysis but was not a significant independent predictor in the final multivariate model adjusting for de

Effect: null

Presence of
decline

Presence of microvascular complications at baseline reduced the probability of achieving guideline-recommended glycemic control by 30% (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53-0.92), indicating that patients with exis

Effect: decline; RR: 0.70; CI: 95% CI: 0.53-0.92

Size: RR: 0.70 CI: 95% CI: 0.53-0.92

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
Presence of
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

The youngest age group (35-49 years) had persistently worse glycemic control compared to the elderly group (>=65 years), with elderly patients having a 39% lower relative risk of persistent poor contr

Effect: decline; RR: 0.61; CI: 95% CI: 0.47-0.79

Size: RR: 0.61 CI: 95% CI: 0.47-0.79

Overall, only 16.3% (95% CI: 14.6-18.1) of participants with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes at baseline achieved guideline-recommended glycemic control (HbA1c <7%) over the study period, while 34.9

Effect: decline; 16.3%; CI: 95% CI: 14.6, 18.1

Size: 16.3% CI: 95% CI: 14.6, 18.1