ExploreOutcomePoor glycemic control
Outcome

Poor glycemic control

Also known as: Persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) Poor glycaemic control Poor glycemic control Poor glycemic control (disorder)
9 findings 1 paper 6 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Longer duration of diabetes (>15 years) was associated with a 41% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) compared to shorter duration (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.15-1.72).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.41; CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72

Size: RR: 1.41 CI: 95% CI: 1.15, 1.72
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34
None
decline

Hyperlipidemia at baseline was associated with a 19% higher risk of persistently poor glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) over the study period (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.06-1.34).

Effect: decline; RR: 1.19; CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Size: RR: 1.19 CI: 95% CI: 1.06, 1.34

Papers (1)