Explore › Finding
Finding null
At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery rates, EQ-5D scores (0.90 vs 0.91, p=0.685), or QALYs at 6 weeks (0.098 vs 0.101, p=0.234).
Effect sizeEQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
Follow-up6 months
ComparatorLaparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (standard laparoscopic technique with same mesh and suture protocol)
Effect summarynull; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Connected entities

Interventions
Robotic sacrocolpopexy
Conditions
Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire 12
Outcomes
Prolapse cure
Populations
Postmenopausal Women

Source

PMC4266590
Robotic Compared With Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Read on PMC → · View in graph →