Explore › Outcome › Prolapse cure
Outcome

Prolapse cure

Also known as: Prolapse cure, symptom bother, quality of life, and health utility at 6 months QoL
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
Robotic sacrocolpopexy1
conditions
Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire 121
populations
Postmenopausal Women1
studys
PMC42665901

Findings (27)

None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
null

At 6 months, there was no difference between robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy groups in POPQ measurements, PFDI/PFIQ subscales, recurrent urinary incontinence symptoms, subsequent sling surgery

Effect: null; EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91

Size: EQ-5D 0.90 vs 0.91
PMC4266590
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →

Papers (1)