Whites

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21

For every 30-unit increase in energy-adjusted glycemic load, Whites had a 1.11-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease over 17 years of follow-up.

Effect: decline; HR 1.11; CI: 95% CI:1.01, 1.21