global sleep quality

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)

Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a subst

Effect: improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03)