Explore ›
Finding
Finding
improvement
Both problem sleepers and non-problem sleepers significantly improved their global sleep quality score (BISQ-R Total) following the mHealth intervention, with the problem sleeper group showing a substantially greater magnitude of improvement (10.4-point gain vs 3.6-point gain).
| Effect size | PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03) |
| Follow-up | 4-28 days |
| Comparator | pre-intervention baseline (same infants before receiving CSP recommendations) |
| Effect summary | improvement; PS group: baseline M = 47.10, follow-up M = 57.48 (ES = 0.35); NPS group: baseline M = 65.10, follow-up M = 68.70 (ES = 0.03) |
| Effect modifiers | [{"modifier": "caregiver-perceived sleep problem status (PS vs NPS)", "interaction_p": "p < .001", "direction": "amplifies", "stratum_details": "PS group: 10.4-point improvement (ES = 0.35). NPS group: 3.6-point improvement (ES = 0.03). Significant time by group interaction: Wilks' lambda = 0.93; F(1, 402) = 29.76, p < .001; ES = 0.07.", "plain_language": "Problem sleepers showed a much bigger improvement in overall sleep quality \u2014 they gained about 10 points on the sleep score compared to about 4 points for non-problem sleepers", "annotation_notes": ""}] |
Connected entities
Interventions
Conditions
Outcomes
Populations
Source
PMC7428151
Effectiveness of an mHealth Intervention for Infant Sleep Disturbances