Single major depressive episode, severe, with psychosis

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

Whether caregivers sustained physical injury was the strongest predictor of MDE (OR=5.61, 95% CI [2.11-15.92]). Among adolescents whose parents were injured, 22.6% met criteria for MDE.

Effect: decline; OR 5.61; CI: 95% CI [2.11–15.92]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]

The extent to which adolescents were exposed to prior traumatic events was associated with greater MDE risk (OR=2.46 per additional trauma type, 95% CI [2.04-2.96]) in the final hierarchical logistic

Effect: decline; OR 2.46; CI: 95% CI [2.04–2.96]