Identifies as female gender

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for PTSD in the final hierarchical logistic regression model (OR=0.48, 95% CI [.30-.77]), indicating that female ad

Effect: decline; OR 0.48; CI: 95% CI [.30–.77]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]

Male gender was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for MDE in the final model (OR=0.35, 95% CI [.23-.54]), indicating female adolescents were approximately three time

Effect: decline; OR 0.35; CI: 95% CI [.23–.54]