Bleeding requiring transfusion

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

MI patients with aortic stenosis receiving both DAPT and oral anticoagulant therapy had substantially increased bleeding risk compared to MI patients without AS on DAPT alone, suggesting additive effe

Effect: adverse; HR 2.47; CI: 95% CI 1.56-3.90

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59

Aortic stenosis was associated with a trend toward increased bleeding risk in MI patients treated with DAPT, but the combined meta-analysis result did not reach statistical significance, with signific

Effect: null; HR 1.59; CI: 95% CI 0.98-2.59