OROS-MPH combined with CBT
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58
None
improvementAdolescents with comorbid conduct disorder who received OROS-MPH had 3.866 times the predicted odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use compared to those with comorbid conduct disorder who r
Effect: improvement; OR=3.866; CI: 95% CI=1.29-11.58