Underweight in childhood

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02

HIV-exposed infants with high ICFI scores showed a trend toward reduced underweight risk compared to those with low scores, but the association did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07) after

Effect: null; HR: 0.79; CI: 95% CI: 0.61, 1.02