High dietary diversity

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 59% higher risk of stunting compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.59 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.23, 2.07

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96

HIV-exposed infants with low dietary diversity scores had 48% higher risk of underweight compared to those with high dietary diversity, after adjusting for confounders.

Effect: improvement; HR: 1.48 (low vs high); CI: 95% CI: 1.12, 1.96