Depressive Symptoms
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)
None
improvementBy four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms than control students (B=-.09, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02
Effect: improvement; B = -.09 (SE = .04)