Explore › Finding
Finding adverse
Bypass-first revascularization was associated with significantly higher 30-day wound complication rates (9.7% vs 3.7%; adjusted OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.71-4.42) and higher blood transfusion or secondary procedure for bleeding (24.3% vs 7.2%) compared with endovascular-first strategy.
Effect sizeOR 2.75
CI95% CI 1.71-4.42
Follow-up30 days
ComparatorEndovascular-first infrageniculate revascularization
Effect summaryadverse; OR 2.75; CI: 95% CI 1.71-4.42
Adverse eventsblood transfusion 24.3%, wound complication 9.7%

Connected entities

Interventions
infrageniculate revascularization
Conditions
Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
Outcomes
wound complications and bleeding

Source

PMC8906190
Clinical outcomes of bypass-first versus endovascular-first strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to infrageniculate arterial disease
Read on PMC → · View in graph →