Explore › Finding
Finding null
There was no significant difference in adjusted 30-day MALE between bypass-first and endovascular-first revascularization in CLTI patients with infrageniculate disease (9% vs 11.2%; OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.08).
Effect sizeOR 0.73
CI95% CI 0.50-1.08
Follow-up30 days
ComparatorEndovascular-first infrageniculate revascularization
Effect summarynull; OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI 0.50-1.08

Connected entities

Interventions
infrageniculate revascularization
Conditions
Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
Outcomes
Major Adverse Cardiac Events

Source

PMC8906190
Clinical outcomes of bypass-first versus endovascular-first strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to infrageniculate arterial disease
Read on PMC → · View in graph →