Explore ›
Finding
Finding
adverse
Women in the robotic sacrocolpopexy group reported significantly more pain at normal activities at 1 week (3.5 +/- 2.1 vs 2.6 +/- 2.2, p=0.044), more unpleasantness of worst pain (2.4 +/- 2.0 vs 1.8 +/- 1.5, p=0.026), more difficulty with activities (45.4 +/- 16.1 vs 38.1 +/- 15.5, p=0.039), and worse SF-36 Physical Health at 2 weeks (41.0 +/- 26.0 vs 57.1 +/- 25.6, p=0.009) compared with laparoscopic, but all differences resolved by 2-6 weeks.
| Effect size | 3.5 vs 2.6 |
| Follow-up | 6 weeks |
| Comparator | Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (standard laparoscopic technique with same mesh and suture protocol) |
| Effect summary | adverse; 3.5 vs 2.6 |
| Adverse events | pain at normal activities 1 week (robotic: 3.5 ± 2.1; laparoscopic: 2.6 ± 2.2), unpleasantness of worst pain (robotic: 2.4 ± 2.0; laparoscopic: 1.8 ± 1.5), difficulty with activities (robotic: 45.4 ± 16.1; laparoscopic: 38.1 ± 15.5), worse SF-36 Physical Health at 2 weeks (robotic: 41.0 ± 26.0; laparoscopic: 57.1 ± 25.6) |
Connected entities
Interventions
Conditions
Outcomes
Populations
Source
PMC4266590
Robotic Compared With Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial