PMC3478419

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

No significant associations were found between men's BMI and the proportion of poor quality embryos on day 3 (p-trend=0.67), slow embryo cleavage rate (p-trend=0.17), or accelerated embryo cleavage ra

Effect: null; p-trend=0.67 (poor quality embryos)

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42

Men's BMI was unrelated to live birth rate per embryo transfer (p-trend=0.42) in the overall combined IVF/ICSI analysis, and this result was unchanged after further adjustment for women's BMI.

Effect: null; p-trend=0.42