Premenopausal Women

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Higher dietary carbohydrate intake was associated with a significantly higher risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a dose-response manner, with the highest quintile showing a hazard ratio of 2.01 co

Effect: adverse; HR 2.01 (Q5 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.26, 3.19)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)

Glycemic load was significantly associated with elevated breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, with the fourth quintile showing a hazard ratio of 1.63 compared to the lowest quintile (95% CI 1.07

Effect: adverse; HR 1.63 (Q4 vs Q1); CI: 95% CI (1.07, 2.48)