ExploreOutcomeSelf-reported comfort with classmates
Outcome

Self-reported comfort with classmates

Also known as: Self-reported comfort with classmates (1-5 scale, 'keep my guard up' to 'always open')
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
populations
studys

Findings (27)

None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)
None
improvement

The Connection Project significantly increased participants' comfort with both intervention group classmates (B=.39, SE=.04, p<.001 at post; B=.16, SE=.05, p<.001 at follow-up) and control group class

Effect: improvement; B = .39 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .39 (SE = .04)

Papers (1)