Resting cerebral blood flow velocity
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec
None
nullThere was a trend for increased resting cerebral blood flow velocity in the candesartan group compared to declines in the lisinopril and HCTZ groups, but this did not reach statistical significance in
Effect: null; Candesartan: +1.03 cm/sec; Lisinopril: -2.12 cm/sec; HCTZ: -2.40 cm/sec