Obesity

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU had a significant indirect effect on reduced obesity at age 22, mediated through improved parent-youth relationship quality and reduced maladaptive eating attitudes, even though the FCU contai

Effect: improvement; indirect effect OR = .98

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant

The FCU intervention condition was not directly associated with obesity at age 22; there was no significant direct effect of assignment to the FCU on the likelihood of being obese 10 years later.

Effect: null; OR not significant