ExploreOutcomeOCD diagnosis rate
Outcome

OCD diagnosis rate

Also known as: OCD diagnosis rate OCD
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
populations
studys

Findings (27)

None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
decline

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with

Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Size: 10.3% vs 2% expected CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%

Papers (1)