Obsessive compulsive disorder caused by cocaine
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%
None
declineLong-term survivors of childhood ALL had a five-fold higher rate of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (10.3%) compared to the general population (2%), and this diagnosis was more strongly associated with
Effect: decline; 10.3% vs 2% expected; CI: 95% CI 6.0-16.2%