Neurocognitive function

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures

Deep brain stimulation was associated with small but statistically significant decrements in working memory, processing speed, phonemic fluency, and visuospatial delayed recall compared with best medi

Effect: adverse; 1.0 to 3.5-point decreases in DBS group vs 1 to 2-point increases in BMT group on composite measures