Functional mobility and strength measures

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.

Despite numerically greater improvements in handgrip strength, gait speed, and 6-minute walk distance in the MRP+UC group compared to usual care, none of these between-group differences in functional

Effect: null; handgrip change 3.6 vs 1.3 kg (p=0.20); gait speed change 0.13 vs 0.07 m/s (p=0.41); 6MWD change 40.6 vs 19.9 ft (p=0.33); SPPB change 1.1 vs 1.