Functional disability and quality of life
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87
None
improvementERT produced statistically significant reductions in functional disability and improvements in quality of life compared to modified attention control, with effects maintained at 9-month follow-up.
Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .87