Generalized Anxiety Disorder

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT did not produce significantly greater improvement than enhanced usual care on clinician-rated GAD severity (GADSS), despite a numerically larger mean change in CBT (2.8 points) than EUC (1.4 point

Effect: null; mean change 2.8 (CBT) vs 1.4 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)

CBT significantly improved worry severity compared with enhanced usual care at 3 months post-treatment, with mean PSWQ scores of 45.6 (CBT) vs 54.4 (EUC), p<.0001, and the improvement was maintained o

Effect: improvement; PSWQ 45.6 vs 54.4; CI: 95% CI 41.3 to 47.8 (CBT) vs 95% CI 51.4 to 57.3 (EUC)