Body Image
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)
None
improvementBody image scores significantly improved from baseline after native tissue vaginal prolapse repair, with clinically significant improvement (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0 on normalized 100-point sca
Effect: improvement; Statistically (p<0.01) and clinically significant improvement from baseline to 6 months (exceeding estimated MID of 13.0)