Explore › Outcome › Academic engagement
Outcome

Academic engagement

Also known as: Academic engagement (10-item self-report scale measuring effort, attention, and persistence in learning activities)
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
Education about Department of Veterans Affairs Make the Connection directory1
conditions
low academic engagement1
populations
Adolescents1
studys
PMC90346481

Findings (27)

None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →
None
improvement

By four-month follow-up, intervention participants displayed significantly higher levels of academic engagement than control students (B=.08, SE=.04, p<.05), with no effect at post-intervention (B=.02

Effect: improvement; B = .08 (SE = .04)

Size: B = .08 (SE = .04)
PMC9034648
Finding details → · Paper → · Graph →

Papers (1)