ExploreInterventionstand-alone bassinet
Intervention

stand-alone bassinet

Also known as: Stand-alone bassinet (standard rooming-in)
6 findings 1 paper 8 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
null

Side-car bassinets did not significantly increase breastfeeding frequency compared to stand-alone bassinets after cesarean birth, despite a trend favoring the side-car group (median 0.6 vs 0.4 bouts/h

Effect: null; median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-alone)

Size: median 0.6 bouts/hour (side-car) vs 0.4 bouts/hour (stand-al
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35
None
adverse

Infants allocated to stand-alone bassinets spent significantly more time positioned on a pillow while in their mother's bed compared to side-car bassinet infants, and sleeping on a pillow with a sleep

Effect: adverse; mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pillow, stand-alone vs side-car); CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Size: mean difference 0.20 (proportion of observation time on pill CI: 95% CI 0.04-0.35

Papers (1)