ExploreInterventiongender mismatch in heart transplantation
Intervention

gender mismatch in heart transplantation

Also known as: Male donor-female recipient gender mismatch in heart transplantation HT
3 findings 1 paper 3 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
studys

Findings (27)

None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea
None
decline

Heart transplant recipients with male donor-female recipient gender mismatch had significantly more treated acute rejections and were rehospitalized more days during the first post-operative year comp

Effect: decline; Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mean rehospitalization 39 days vs Group 1 mean 22 days

Size: Group 3 mean rejections 4.7 vs Group 1 mean 2.8; Group 3 mea

Papers (1)