court-mandated treatment

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)

Adolescents court-mandated to treatment had greater odds of achieving a 50% reduction in substance use but lower odds of completing treatment, compared to voluntary participants.

Effect: mixed; OR=3.71 (SUD responder); OR=0.40 (treatment completer); CI: 95% CI: 1.26 to 10.89 (SUD responder); 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.94 (treatment completer)