ExploreInterventionNegative mood regulation expectancies
Intervention

Negative mood regulation expectancies

Also known as: Negative mood regulation expectancies (NMR scale) as time-varying risk factor
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (27)

None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34
None
decline

Weaker negative mood regulation expectancies (lower belief in ability to alter negative moods) were associated with greater poly-substance use over time, specifically associated with more marijuana an

Effect: decline; beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Size: beta = -.04, t(7726) = -3.34

Papers (1)