Donor-recipient gender mismatch

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%

Gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients did not have significantly different first-year survival compared to gender-matched recipients, despite both mismatched groups having numerically higher m

Effect: null; Group 2 deaths 22.5% vs Group 3 deaths 17.6% vs Group 1 deaths 13.6%