ExploreInterventionConduct Disorder
Intervention

Conduct Disorder

Also known as: CONDUCT DIS Comorbid conduct disorder (K-SADS-E diagnosis, present vs absent) Conduct Disorder Conduct Disorders Conduct disorder Conduct disorder (disorder) Disturbance of conduct NOS Disturbance of conduct NOS (disorder) Unspecified disturbance of conduct Unspecified disturbance of conduct (disorder) [X]Conduct disorder, unspecified [X]Conduct disorders +2 more
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (27)

None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)
None
decline

Adolescents with comorbid conduct disorder showed less improvement in ADHD symptoms during treatment than those without conduct disorder, regardless of medication assignment.

Effect: decline; LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Size: LS mean 17.53 (SE=1.41) vs 22.42 (SE=0.98)

Papers (1)