Assessment of family history using genogram

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD

Among clinical features (as opposed to imaging or lab tests), absence of any family history of coronary heart disease was the strongest negative risk marker, providing moderate downgrading of CHD and

Effect: improvement; DLR 0.76 (SD 0.07) for all CHD; DLR 0.81 (SD 0.06) for CVD