childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r

Long-term survivors of childhood ALL treated with chemotherapy only had significantly higher rates of self-reported inattention (27.9%) and parent-reported attention problems (23.6%) compared to the 1

Effect: decline; 27.9% impaired (self-report inattention) and 23.6% impaired (parent-report attention problems) vs 10% expected; CI: 95% CI 21.0-35.7% (self-r