ExploreConditionStroke
Condition

Stroke

Also known as: Accident - cerebrovascular Apoplexy Apoplexy, Cerebrovascular Apoplexy, NOS Brain Vascular Accident Brain Vascular Accidents CVA CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident) CVA - Cerebrovascular accident CVA - Cerebrovascular accident unspecified CVA - cerebrovascular accident (& unspecified [& stroke]) CVA - cerebrovascular accident (& unspecified [& stroke]) (disorder) +34 more
21 findings 2 papers 12 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
null

Intensive blood pressure control resulted in similar numbers of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke subtypes compared to standard control in SPRINT, with no subtype showing a statistically significant tre

Effect: null; Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs 8

Size: Hemorrhagic: 6 vs 7; LAA: 11 vs 13; CE: 11 vs 15; SAO: 8 vs
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78
None
decline

Women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy had nearly 2.5 times the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease compared to age- and parity-matched women with normotensive pregnancies.

Effect: decline; HR 2.41; CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Size: HR 2.41 CI: 95% CI 1.54-3.78

Papers (2)