Prostate Cancer
Related entities
Findings (50)
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
nullAndrogen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer was not associated with changes in clinical pain (BPI), pressure pain thresholds, cold pain tolerance, mechanical pain temporal summation, or c
Effect: null; 0.31; CI: 95% CI = -0.55 to 1.17
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37
None
adverseMen undergoing ADT experienced statistically significant worsening in physical role limitation quality of life compared to eugonadal controls, while other QOL domains (emotional well-being, emotional
Effect: adverse; -18.28; CI: 95%CI= -30.18 to -6.37